Apr 29, 2023
This title has also been published as video in Deutsch und English on our Youtube channel
https://youtube.com/@KarmaTengyalLing
We have now had what one might call a worst-case scenario in
Buddhism.
And I have to say that the situation that has arisen in this way is
not held against the Dalai Lama
directly, but rather against the people around the Dalai Lama.
There has just been this scandal between the Dalai Lama and a
little Indian boy because it appears
to be an Indian boy and not a Tibetan boy because the Dalai Lama
speaks English to that boy.
So he didn't speak Tibetan, but English.
That means the press was there, there were people who recorded it
on video and you can see that
on the internet.
And now the really big scandal, where it comes down to it, did the
action between the Dalai Lama
and the boy imply sexuality, so to speak, was it sexual abuse.
The Dalai Lama has also publicly apologized for the situation that
happened.
And the people who are very close to the Dalai Lama then said,
well, you know that the Dalai
Lama always does something very casual and stuff like that.
And that's outside of the narrow Buddhist scene.
Right now in the camp of people who are in the Tibetan Buddhist
community, especially in the
West, it's incredibly difficult for practising Buddhists to sort
that out.
There are those who defend what the Dalai Lama does and say yes,
whatever the Dalai Lama does
is right and everything is okay.
And then, on the other hand, those who have lost a great deal of
trust in the Buddha's teachings
as a result.
There were also people who are very critical of our social
conditions in today's society.
And then a situation like the one that happened between the Dalai
Lama and this little boy in
public.
That's what happened, and I'm just saying that now, because of
course I can't prove it, but I know
myself that we often have situations where lamas and rinpoches are
surrounded by very bad
advisors.
A Dalai Lama is not omniscient, because all the Rinpoches are not
as realized as Buddha
Shakyamuni, it is said that he was omniscient, but the Rinpoches
don't have that kind of
omniscience and lineage holders don't usually have that either.
And so, if you are somehow aware of this now, then we should
understand that these problems
arise because we live in a degenerate age where the Dharma teacher
himself, surrounded by the
students, can drag down the Dharma teacher.
Especially when someone has a lot of students.
Then you also have to understand that the Dalai Lama lives the way
he does, also from a political
point of view, where you sometimes overhear statements from the
Dalai Lama that may not
necessarily be logical, but where the point is that his main aim is
that he has to take care of the
Tibetan people, all the Tibetans who are in exile.
They depend on him.
He holds together the Tibetans living in exile.
And then you have to see that there are a lot of powerful beings
around him who also use the
Dalai Lama and influence how he behaves.
So I think that this happened partly because the people around him
don't inform him enough. He
gets a lot of information, but not necessarily the information he
needs socially.
The scandal that we had three or four years ago when it came to
Sogyal Rinpoche is an example
of the fact that trust in Buddhism has now of course been greatly
weakened as a result.
From this situation, as it is now publicly presented to the Dalai
Lama, I can understand every
outsider's loss of trust in the Buddhist teachings as a result.
Trust has been lost from saying how Sogyal Rinpoche behaved. All
these accusations at Sogyal
Rinpoche were being made, I listened carefully and built the
constellation of how these different
things were presented.
Namely, what was the difference between what Sogyal Rinpoche did
and what was here. Here
with the Dalai Lama dispute, it was a child and it was in public
and what was portrayed there.
Anyone can google it themselves, what was there in detail, I don't
want to describe it now, but
you can see it for yourself.
And I can understand why people don't get along with it.
With Sogyal Rinpoche, the situation was different. Those were
adults. They were grown people.
And I've been dealing with this topic of Buddhism for almost 40
years.
In that time I met more than 60 teachers, and experienced the
behavior of the students around
me, of all of us western students, all of whom I met, Germans,
French, Americans, English,
Australians.
Everyone always wanted the highest teachings. So what we're doing
here now is kindergarten for
them. What we did here this morning is preschool. They understood
that a long time ago. They're
not interested in that. It bores them, it's boring to talk about
the four thoughts that turn the
mind.
They wanted only the highest teachings. The very best, the most
beautiful, the greatest. What's
the biggest? That's not even tantra anymore. There is a Kriya
tantra, that is outer purity. No, they
want the non-dualistic. Yes, then let's do father and mother
tantra. No, we want to do the non-
dual tantra. No, that's actually way too complicated.
We then do Mahamudra and Dzogchen. Actually, that's too much. We
only do Maha Ati now. We
are Maha Ati.
And people think they have the skills. In order to be able to
realize this at all, you need a Vajra
master.
A Dzogchen master. In order to realize Dzogchen, you don't have to
listen and ponder
intellectually in your mind, but you have to experience the
non-existent of the Self in your mind.
The non-self-experience. Only then can you realize Dzogchen. Only
then can you realize non-
duality. So a Dzogchen master has only one task.
He has to keep kicking your ass. Constantly. He must get your ego
boiling.
And I remember one teacher, I really appreciate him so much, it's
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche.
He has done and is still doing such fantastic things.
I'm always touched by him whenever he says anything. And he also
does it very cleverly and he
noticed that with Sogyal Rinpoche and then also what's going on in
America with Mipham
Rinpoche and Shambala and stuff like that.
And Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche said he is not as courageous as
Trungpa Rinpoche and Sogyal
Rinpoche.
These Rinpoches offered their disciples their own flesh, their own
bodies. Not sexually, but they
sacrificed their body, sacrificed it to the students.
They gave everything to them. The students wanted Dzogchen
Mahamudra and the Rinpoches
did everything to make that happen. They have every means that was
right, that was at all
possible, to crack the ego to give them a chance to experience
non-duality.
Trungpa Rinpoche had a situation with them where they said, somehow
he just called the closer
people at night, to say he wanted to eat this and that now.
And then they thought, that wanting to eat something, was his
greed.
But he only did what he had to do. What does he have to do?
Imagine yourselves, Wolf and Dorothy, are lying comfortably in bed,
the phone rings, and you
pick it up.
"Get up! I want pancakes now!", I say to you as if I were your
Vajra master, which I'm not. (I'm a
slob.)
Imagine you are hanging up on me and Dorothy saying: "Has Horst
lost his mind?"
"Well, you know, Dorothy," Wolf would note, "we said we
wanted Dzogchen Mahamudra from
him. So is this the price for that? Having to get up at night and
then get him pancakes because he
wants to eat pancakes now? I can't believe it. Does he have a
quirk?"
And so, if I were a Vajra master now, you then begin to fight my
effort to boil your ego.
And then I would say to Ramon: "You know Ramon, every time you come
I want a tenth of your
net income from you.
Give me that." And when you bring me ten percent, I would say, why
don't you give me fourteen
percent?
I would like to have ten percent, be a little generous, give me
fourteen percent.
And then you'd think, he's suddenly become so greedy.
Be glad you didn't do that and I wouldn't do that to you,
either.
But of course I am not your vajra master. I have no intention of
letting the vajra master hang out
around here.
However, if people mean they really want to experience non-duality,
then they have to pay the
price.
They can't have it for free. Not because Sogyal Rinpoche, a vajra
master, needs it.
But we in the West, we're so arrogant, we're so lofty that we think
we're great students like
Naropa, like Marpa, like Milarepa, like Gampopa, like the first
Karmapa.
We would be such eligible students for a Vajra master.
But when the Vajra master makes BOOH, we go BAAAAH.
And because of that, I examined the various things that were
assumed of Sogyal Rinpoche, I
examined them analytically and looked what causes his behavior,
what he does then.
He cuts across Westerners' concepts of anything.
And Trungpa Rinpoche did something similar in the 1980s when he was
in Marburg.
Oh, Trungpa Rinpoche comes to Marburg!
There is only one public event!
And at that time, I think, they were supposed to pay something
around 300 or 350 Deutschmarks
for the evening.
That's more expensive than a concert with the Beatles or the
Rolling Stones back then.
I think that's triple or quadruple if you sat in the front row.
Not everyone is sitting in the front row in that hall in
Marburg.
The event was announced to start at half past seven.
Now that we've paid 300 Deutschmarks, we want something for it,
don't we?
However, Trungpa Rinpoche keeps people waiting.
Seven forty-five. Eight. Half past eight. Eight forty-five.
People just wait.
We have now paid so much, now we want something for it.
This is our attitude.
And he comes in swaying, held by his students.
Completely drunk. He looks that way.
He staggers in.
Sits down on the chair.
Says a few sentences.
I think the whole thing lasted a maximum of fifteen minutes from
what I've been told.
Then he gets up and goes outside.
And the whole thing was still like that, I think until ten
o'clock.
We just sat in there and said, will he be right back? Does this go
any further?
But he's out.
Did he just want to pee outside?
No, he's gone then, he didn't come back.
And we paid 300 Deutschmarks for that?
It's mean, isn't it?
Isn't that mean?
Fifteen minutes.
Everyone who participates actually knows that this is the 11th
Trungpa Rinpoche.
They know he presents crazy wisdom.
Everyone who took part knows that.
They knew there was something said to show the nature of mind.
For this, one has to be prepared.
And he did.
He showed people the nature of mind.
And they didn't look.
Maybe some, but very few.
I then heard later that was the scandal that was going around at
the time.
He took so much money for it and they complained that they got so
little.
That was half a year later, in Albertstrasse in Berlin.
A photographer who also took beautiful black and white photos of
Tai Sitoo Rinpoche, told me
he had been there.
People were really pissed off.
And I said, shit, if I had only gone there.
I didn't have enough money and neither did I have the time and I
didn't have a car.
I didn't have a friend with whom to stay overnight in Marburg, I
would have needed a hotel or
whatever, so I didn't manage to get there.
And I said, man, I'm sorry I wasn't there.
Because that would have been the chance.
A mind-to-mind transmission, that's what Trungpa Rinpoche did
there.
Because I knew the stories of what such yogis, who have crazy
wisdom from earlier times, do.
And I regretted that I wasn't there.
And then all of a sudden it was like being struck by lightning.
My joy and my regret that I was not there resulted in me getting
the blessing of it even though I
wasn't there.
It went through my whole body like lightning.
And suddenly a lot of things that I never understood, made sense to
me.
The ones I didn't get along with.
Oh, that's how it is.
Oh, that's what it means.
Oh, I see.
That went for days.
A lot of things I didn't understand, I then understood them
afterwards.
Not that I can now say I have any yogic abilities, which are now
theoretically here.
None of that.
But if you as Westerners hang in there like that, and don't know
the culture, don't understand a
lot, and suddenly it becomes so clear to you.
You are told what it is exactly, and here is what I commend to
you.
Be careful when people judge any teacher.
Now, with Sogyal Rinpoche, I still defend Sogyal Rinpoche and I
don't let dirt and dust fall on
him.
And if people should picture me on the internet as a somehow
narcissistic ego teacher or
whatever, totally gaga - well, I can live with their cursing, I
have no problem with that.
And I will continue to defend him.
I will defend Trungpa Rinpoche and also Mipham Rinpoche in
America.
All the allegations are going on there and we don't just have
what's going on with the Dalai
Lama.
We still have that people keep claiming and just repeating the
claims because someone else said,
repeat that and they say there must be something to it if anyone
says so, and so on.
For example that the Karmapa had illegitimate children somewhere,
well, our Karmapa, Ogyen
Trinley Dorje, he's under supervision all the time, he's never
alone, and the close monks around
him, they wouldn't understand if he took a woman in there with him,
and then he's practically
next to the door, and they kind of pop around in there and
stuff.
And people then say, Karmapa should just give a DNA sample, and
then one can check whether
it's true.
Just this idea of ??doing this, going into it, now Karmapa has to
prove if he is the father or non-
father, or else it is just claimed that he had done it.
And then in 'Buddhismus heute', a magazine by the DBU, a woman
wrote, that there was a
scandal about the Karmapa in Canada, the proceedings were
discontinued, an out-of-court
agreement was then reached - without mentioning that this is
speculation, but continuing that
dropping the case would be an admission that something had
happened.
That's how westerners write about it.
Why? Because they just want to make themselves important like the
monk Tenzin here in
Germany, who only cares because he picks on Sogyal Rinpoche.
I don't know how he's dealing with this story now, with the Dalai
Lama, the way he's doing it now,
because Tenzin said that the Dalai Lama praised him, that he does a
lot of great things, how
Tenzin is behaving now.
I am not criticizing the Dalai Lama for what he did, it's not my
job to criticize that.
All I'm saying is it's a very awkward situation for all Buddhists
in the west, people are losing faith,
and that's because of the atmosphere created around the Dalai Lama,
the advisors that he has.
And I know that when a situation is very unfavorable to a great
teacher, weak students who think
they have more power than the teacher, can drag the teacher into
difficult situations.
Karmically it doesn't have a direct effect now, so that the Dalai
Lama would have to suffer
because of this, but it simply means that his work becomes more
difficult, his activities become
more difficult.
Likewise the activities of Karmapa Ogyen Trinley Dorje, of the
Buddha who, somewhere in Europe,
how do you say, works incognito all the time and gives teachings
via Zoom, if such talk is used,
his activities will of course be restricted.
And so remember, if you hear any criticism of teachers, it's
interesting that in all the scandals, the
real abusers will not be in the spotlight, like the one Zen teacher
in Bavaria or Baden-
Wuerttemberg, the one sentenced to eight years in prison for real
sexual abuse of refugee
children.
You hear next to nothing about it in the Buddhist scene.
Then there is this film by Arte, where at the beginning they
mention a French teacher, a Buddhist
teacher who opens up there as if he was a super lama and started a
community there. You don't
hear anything about his sentence from a French court to seven or
eight years on probation
because he was found guilty in many, many cases where he treated
children very, very badly -
psychological, physical violence or whatever, I haven't read the
charges.
The children had to do prostrations, they had to practice Buddhism,
which of course doesn't work
at all in our western society.
In Tibet the children like to do this on their own and voluntarily,
but not here.
And when the western parents will become Buddhists, children will
be forced into such an
institution.
And if they will not participate and will not obey, then there's a
kind of food deprivation or they
get bad food or something like that.
He was found guilty.
That will not be discussed.
But what you then accuse the great teachers of, that's a big
deal.
There you have it.
There are several more cases, for example in America, of former
students of Trungpa Rinpoche,
Westerners who then thought, well, I'm also a Dharma teacher now
and when Trungpa Rinpoche
has sex with women, well, then I can move my student to having sex
with me, too, because I'm so
great, as well.
Do you understand?
These scandals won't happen, I can see from that how partisan and
how paradoxical Westerners'
criticism is of the various people where something like this
happens.
And the reason why I mention this now is so that it is very clear:
I stand for the Buddhist
teachings, I stand behind the teachers, I also talk about it when
there are problems but I want to
make it clear that we need to think why anything can happen in the
first place.
That it has a lot to do with the sensitivity of the people who are
around a teacher, where you then
say, well, here it would be cheaper, we now live here in
public.
There are so many problems, let's think how in America, for
example, right now since Biden is in
office, about 100,000 children, unaccompanied children, come across
the border and disappear
somewhere in America.
Nobody knows where they are.
For child trafficking where abuse of children is supported by the
Biden administration, by the fact
that down there everyone can get in unchecked.
And we also had that here in Germany, in 2015, where many children
who were not registered
simply disappeared.
In the beginning there were so and so many children and then the
kids were gone.
One would say, well, they just disappeared somewhere among their
family relatives.
But they're just gone, because, if they had showen up at the
families, then the families would
suddenly have more children, right?
But it doesn't happen.
So also in Europe, all over the world children are abused, they are
helpless, helpless objects of
sexual desires, with delusions that they have.
And then, of course, when something happens like that with the
Dalai Lama, people think in the
back of their minds: the Dalai Lama kind of gives the blessing that
children can be used and
treated like shit.
No!
Because here in this case it was the boy asking the Dalai Lama, if
he can hug the Dalai Lama.
And then the Dalai Lama said yes.
And that's exactly where you see it, this situation, a limit, where
one does not know from the
outside what is it that the child felt, what is what the Dalai Lama
felt - but what emerges on the
outside.
Hug, then kiss, and then tongue touch, with your own tongue.
Then it's a chain reaction where you say you don't know if the
child wanted it of his own accord,
or whether it did so because the Dalai Lama said so.
So when do we in the West really call it sexual abuse?
If I ask if a child will you hug me, then it's something of me,
when the child comes up to me and
says, will you hug me, or just comes and hugs me, then I can allow
it because it would not be
sexual abuse.
It would come from me if I asked the child to give me
something.
And that's the difficult thing, when a lot of people who are now
trying to protect children, just
have this sequence. Then all the others arrive that have thrown
dirt on the Dalai Lama before, like
some Goldner or so, an Austrian, who has spent an hour and a half
on the internet, in a university
or somewhere, ranting about what nonsense the Dalai Lama is
telling.
I also listened to what he said, it just became clear to me he
didn't understand at all what the
Dalai Lama was talking about, because he lacks the basics.
So if we're missing the basics as I say it here, that all
appearances that we have around us here are
of a purely illusory nature, they are dreamlike, nothing of what is
around us is a reality.
If you don't have a Buddhist basis there, then you might say that,
if it's actually just an illusion, a
dreamlike appearance, not real, then you may commit any abuse.
You may as well do any damage you want, right?
That's your consequence, because you lack the foundation.
This is why one often speaks of the secret teachings, meaning they
are not secret because they are
hidden, but because they are not understood.
Also, the appreciation for the words is not there because the
structure is missing.
So therefore always try to think for yourselves, when you do
something with Buddhism, the first
priority is: you turn to the Buddha's teaching because you want to
overcome your suffering.
That should be your only motivation.
Your motivation should not be, you want to save the world now.
For the benefit of all sentient beings.
No, be honest - you're only doing it because you want to overcome
the suffering in your mind.
The second is, keep in your mind, keep in your mind all the time
that you have a direct
relationship with the teachings of the Buddha.
And not about others and what others think - instead, it is always
a personal, intimate connection
that we have with the Buddha's teachings. + + +
A Commentary by Yogi Horst R Brumm, German Buddhist Institute Karma Tengyal Ling.
For over 30 years, Horst R Brumm, born 1954, headed the non-profit German Buddhist Institute Karma Tengyal Ling. Her Eminence Khandro Rinpoche asked him to teach in 2010. In 2016 she officially declared him a yogi. In 2023 he was named Dharma teacher for Germany.
Yogi Horst R Brumm may receive donations. Please find the details at he end of the Podcast Description. Thank you kindly!
--------------------
Already published episodes with alternating languages:
Dharma für Anfänger 3
Missverständnis Buddhismus (1 through 3)
'weisheit spezial' episodes (Lama teachings)
Christmas greeting for Christians and Buddhists by Yogi Horst R Brumm (no sound, read only)
Sogyal Rinpoche and Fatal Errors of Western Buddhists (dubbed).
-----------------------------------------------------------
Our presentation to view and download (12MB pdf) : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1J3W9B377b7CE3lJWJ8D0QXuVpr8FR55COHxyRy7Ilwk/edit?usp=sharing